Reasons for Returning to College Essay -- Personal Narrative, Admissi

Returning back to class was an extremely characteristic choice for me. It was by all accounts the following legitimate advance in my own and vocation objectives. My definitive objective is to be cheerful and sound and be a decent supplier and good example. With that put in a safe spot for the present, my next objective is to be monetarily steady and ready to accommodate my family in manners that my family couldn't accommodate me. I certainly hope to work for what I need and acquire all of it. The latest spark was that my organization was eager to contribute a gigantic piece of the yearly educational cost, in this manner expelling some money related weight. This causes me to feel like they genuinely care about my future and they truly need to see me succeed. I have a few individual explanations behind coming back to class. I pay attention to my own objectives very. Some may state that I am my own most exceedingly awful pundit and I am challenging for myself. I just feel that I can and will improve and I don't agree to anything besides the best out of myself. Eventually, I need to live with myself and the choices I make regularly for an amazing remainder. I should satisfy my very own objectives else I am not offering myself to others totally. I have clear and explicit individual objectives. To start, I need to be monetarily steady. By having my degree, I need to have the option to show signs of improvement work through an advancement in this manner getting more cash. I need to have the option to enable my kid to pay for school so he doesn?t need to battle as hard as I did to get myself through school. In addition, m...

My Dropout Boyfriend Kept Dropping in Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

My Dropout Boyfriend Kept Dropping in - Essay Example experiencing the phases of a Goth, a revolutionary, and a Marxist. The creator possibly doesn't completely comprehend what her beau, Terry, accepts is the motivation behind why he needs to do this. After Conell subtleties Terry’s thinking behind this decision, she reacts by occupying the subject. Rather than inquiring as to why he wants to live out in the forested areas, Conell answers that she prefers his condo. Terry’s choice to live like a vagrant has nothing to do with his condo so the creator is remove the consideration from living in the forested areas and concentrating more on what he is surrendering. Possibly he may have adjusted his perspective on the off chance that she had given some legitimate reasons why he ought not live that way. Since the creator didn't manage the issue at the outset organizes, this wacky thought was permitted to run and prosper to its regular decision. Besides, Conell appears to by and by negate herself when she makes reference to a con versation with a young lady from her residence. She starts the discussion by giving her anxiety for his prompt wellbeing, however after her candid companion determinedly excuses the thought, Conell attempts to go to bat for her sweetheart. Her thinking is that he will set aside a great deal of cash and that he will feel near nature. This implies Conell has weakness issues since she isn't excessively enamored with the thought herself, yet when another person participates in assaulting Terry, she quickly recovers her up and protects him like there’s no tomorrow. Affirming her previous stun at Terry’s choice to decide to live like this, Conell makes reference to a book that he gave her on Valentine’s Day, Into the Wild. In this book, a youngster starves to death in the Alaskan wild. Her admonition ringers ought to have been blazing when this happened on the grounds that it's anything but a standard event to give somebody a book like this on Valentine’s Day, which is a day about adoration and bliss. With all due respect, she concedes this ought to understand and that she didn't plan for this choice just as she could have. Conell gives us extraordinary knowledge into Terry’s propensities and character when she portrays the time she initially met him. She concedes that he was an insubordinate individual, in spite of the fact that she yields that she was pulled in to this. The explanation behind this was she felt a similar path as he did about numerous things and this permitted her to communicate her own sentiments. She gives the case of Terry wearing eyeliner and connecting a security pin through his eyebrow; these are exemplary admonition indications of somebody who is inclined to avoiding the pattern. The one distinction between these two is that the two of them act their sentiments out in various manners. Conell states how Terry is additionally cordial, while she is a greater amount of the modest kind. This implies perhaps these two are not appropriate for one another. Conell neglects to make reference to how this difference in their conduct influenced their relationship. Later on, Conell makes reference to that Terry dropped out of school just months into his first year. The main explanation that she gives for this choice is that he was discontent with school, yet maybe it was something more profound; something that Conell appears to forget about so without any problem. She utilizes the word â€Å"defended† when gotten some information about this bizarre choice by her companions. This shows Conell isn't really in full concurrence with his decision on the grounds that else she would have said that she

Answers for ESL Learners

Answers for ESL Learners What are Adjectives? Descriptive words will be words that depict items, individuals and spots. She has a quick vehicle. - Fastâ describes the car.Susan is wise.- Intelligentâ describes Susan.Thats a delightful mountain. - Beautiful depicts mountain. As it were, descriptive words depict qualities of various things.  There are nine sorts of descriptive words which are clarified beneath. Each sort of descriptor incorporates a connect to additionally subtleties of the specific sentence structure utilization. Graphic Adjectives Graphic descriptive words are the most well-known kind of modifier and are utilized to depict a specific quality, for example, huge, little, costly, modest, and so on of the article. When utilizing more than one elucidating descriptive word, it is critical to ensure that they are put in the correctâ adjective request. Jennifer has a troublesome job.That miserable kid needs some ice cream.Susan bought a costly vehicle. Legitimate Adjectives Legitimate descriptive words are determined fromâ proper nounsâ and should consistently be promoted. Appropriate descriptive words are regularly used to show the inception of something. Appropriate descriptors are additionally regularly the name of a language or a people.â French tires are excellent.Italian food is the best!Jack favors Canadian maple syrup. Quantitative Adjectives Quantitative descriptive words give us what number of something is accessible. As it were, numbers are quantitative descriptive words. In any case, there are other quantitative descriptors such asâ several, many, a great deal ofâ which are likewise known asâ quantifiers. There are two flying creatures in that tree.She has numerous companions in Los Angeles.I check sixteen mix-ups on your schoolwork. Inquisitive Adjectives Inquisitive descriptive words are utilized to pose inquiries. Inquisitive descriptive words incorporate which and what. Basic expressions utilizing inquisitive modifiers include: Which type/sort of and what type/sort of in addition to a noun.â Which sort of vehicle do you drive?What time would it be advisable for me to come?What kind of dessert do you like? Possessive Adjectives Possessive adjectivesâ are like subject and article pronouns, however they show possession. Possessive modifiers incorporate my, your, his, her, its, our, and their.â My home is on the corner.I welcomed their companions to dinner.Her hound is neighborly. Possessive Nouns Possessive things act like possessive descriptive words however are framed by utilizing a noun. Possessive things are made by adding a punctuation to a thing to demonstrate ownership, for example, theâ cars shading, or theâ friends get-aways. Toms closest companion is Peter.The books spread is misleading.The houses garden is lovely. Predicate Adjectives Predicate descriptors are put toward the finish of a sentence or condition to depict the thing toward the start of a sentence. Predicate modifiers are regularly utilized with the action word to be. His activity is stressful.The get-away was enjoyable.It most likely isnt simple. Articles Unmistakable and inconclusive articlesâ can be thought of as a kind of modifier since they portray the thing as one of numerous or a particular occurrence of a specific object.  A and an are uncertain articles,â theâ is the distinct article. Tom might want an apple.She composed the book that is on the table.I requested a glass of brew. Illustrative Pronouns Illustrative pronounsâ show which objects (thing or thing phrase) is implied. Definite pronouns includeâ this, that, these and those. This and that are solitary decisive modifiers, while these and those are plural. Definite pronouns are additionally known asâ determiners. I might want that sandwich for lunch.Andrew carried these books for everybody to read.Those trees are lovely! Modifiers Quiz Locate the modifier andâ identify its structure. Browse: elucidating adjectiveproper adjectivequantitative adjectiveinterrogative adjectivepossessive nounpredicate adjectivedemonstrative pronoun I gave the ball to her cousin.Education is important.They have a lovely daughter.Which sort of vehicle did you choose to purchase yesterday?Those vehicles have a place with Peter.She has a great deal of companions in China.Chicago is amazing!Jennifer proposed a rich answer for the problem.What sort of evaluations did you get?Helens house is situated in Georgia. Italian food is the best!Holidays can be exhausting at times. Alex has three books.Its a hot day.Our companion didnt answer the inquiry. Answers: her - possessive adjectiveimportant - pronominal adjectivebeautiful - elucidating adjectivewhich sort of - inquisitive adjectivethose - expressive pronouna parcel of - quantitative adjectiveamazing - pronominal adjectiveelegant - graphic adjectivewhat sort of - inquisitive adjectiveHelens - possessive nounItalian - appropriate adjectiveboring - pronominal adjectivethree - quantitative adjectivehot - unmistakable adjectiveour - possessive descriptor

Massively multiplayer online game Essay

Before PC games thrived through the past periods, patintero, sungka, tumbang-preso, tumba-lata, tagu-taguan and sipa were one of the most foreseen open air games inside our nation. Encountering these sorts of games engraves nearly our half life and we can’t have a total youth experience without getting tapped hard on the back, been hit by a flying shoe for it missed the objective, playing with shells, shouting and cheering over your colleagues, hopping over an individual and abstaining from getting hit its body part, and stowing away and cover in a spot to keep from being the ‘it’ of the game. Take a stab at asking a kid what was his preferred youth experience, and would tell either scratched his knee from fleeing from his rival or been chided by mother in light of returning home late because of surpassing assigned time of playing outside games. What's more, have a go at asking a kid from the current century what he has been doing recently, and might find a solution playing tekken with PSP, or Super Mario or Pacman with Nintendo or Xbox. Contrast spotted? At the point when a youngster is in the peak of playing and been paying attention to the game, he doesn’t need to be upset for in some occurrence may free on his adversary and can’t advance to the following redesigns. A typical response got by guardians when they call their youngsters to assemble around while their children were occupied with proceeding joysticks and consoles and faces were simply centimeters from the screen would be â€Å"Mom! Can’t you hold up in light of the fact that I’m as of now on my approach to bring down Bowser! † And two probabilities may occur after: either the guardians would begin shouting and rehash on advising to put aside their caring devices or the kids would get disturbed on the blasting uproarious voices and begin storming off and lock themselves in a room where they could keep lauding themselves for they have vanquished the ‘boss’ in the game. With the assistance of cutting edge mechanical development that has spread far and wide, the start of 3D and multi-player web based gaming (MMORPG) have surfaced and snared kids the most. Youngsters fell into the gaming scene, investing more energy in virtual as opposed to in genuine, which sooner goes to be their life. Like, youngsters must have a degenerate youth like these; playing PCs during their extra time and messing around with his co-gamers. They have an inclination that they can play whenever any of the freshest discharged games go on without consummation, they proceed perpetually, and they can get any character they needed on the virtual world. On the off chance that a youngster began to feel in contact more with gaming, he will invest more energy in single isolation. It is hard for certain teenagers (especially male youths) who are powerless against the territory of inclined to video game enslavement since it may be straightforward to state how well known gaming is in offspring everything being equal, which results to for the most part negative outcomes. A report like found in Elyria, Ohio, where a multi year-old kid named Daniel Petric shot his folks in the head after they reallocated his duplicate of ‘Halo 3. ‘ His mom was slaughtered and his dad injured because of the discharges, and the upset high schooler fled the homicide scene with exclusively one thing in his ownership: the ‘Halo 3’ game (Ridgefield, 2009). A comparative report flashed on TV says that a youngster has incidentally murdered his mate, cut with a blade after mate got a higher score on the game Flabby Bird and now been sent under the consideration of DSWD. A few reports like this have rang the ears of the mass since the impact of gaming has gotten increasingly genuine. Everything began from playing guiltlessly, never knew gradually by gradually they are being eaten with inebriation of gaming and now gulped of gaming compulsion. Results like slaughtering have been a genuine admonition to the individuals who are shockingly enjoyed playing, however regularly simply overlooked. The computer games are basic to be accused, which we disregard the way that some may have done wrongdoings since they are frequently being dismissed by guardians. Originating from a solitary parent family isn’t a factor, yet how a parent sees after his youngster while developing. A long way from my insight, it is the obligation of the guardians to care for their children when connected with into various parts of genuine and virtual life. Yet, most kids set out to state that they’ve been controlled over their life, treated like human robots; like advised to eat appropriately, rest on schedule, do school assignments and how to invest their energy basically. Be that as it may, no one orders them whenever they found the opportunity to get hold of gaming materials, in light of the fact that in there, they consider themselves the â€Å"Thug Lords of Gaming†. Affectionate to their name, with seething adrenaline surge can't get away from the virtual life. Limiting children from playing won’t help to drive the compulsion either, for having is impact of our youth. The more we drag them away, the more they rebel and truly decided into coexisting with playing. Specifically, existence with no play is all around terrible. Who wouldn’t like to encounter playing sipa, tumbang preso, luksong-baka and patintero? Who wouldn’t like to meet a beloved companion? None right? Those probably won't be like the games inside the PC world, yet those are the fundamental establishment of gaming not until the late hundreds of years where computer games were designed. With expanding level of last sides of gaming, a few guardians are over-defensive over their children to the degree that they lock their offsprings into a prison a far distance from their alleged fun adolescence. They never got the opportunity to have ‘real’ companions. In some case, a kid who has this experience growing up social event decorations for their folks is the main thing imparted in their psyches. On opposite, a youngster who invested more energy in playing grows up stopping practically 70% of his public activity. This may lead into a few genuine impacts like having a mental issue because of over the top glitch of the cerebrum. Also, here’s the dubious and hazardous part: they are the ‘unhappy teenagers’ which later have a developing rate in the globe. They have lost their trust in conveying and brought down their confidence. They’ve invested the entirety of their energy associating in a virtual world and are amazingly awkward when managing genuine individuals continuously. So as to recover the piece of them which just got lost, they look for consideration from others. Or on the other hand a likelihood that they would drive all away from himself and simply have an existence with the unbelievable, which may prompt genuine slaughtering violations like what we’ve been dreading to occur. Being a gamer isn’t risky. It is making some hard memories kicking the propensity who’s the genuine adversary. It's anything but a disappointment to play PC games, however be cautious about getting dependent. Reconsider before connecting entirely, for everything that is over the top can cause horrible impacts, twofold the damage we figure it would cause to us. We, similar to the most clients of techno-gaming, are the ones responsible for what may happen when we are suffocated in the pool of virtual scenes. What's more, as a gamer, as well, having has quite recently been impact of my life. It is exactly how we balance our time among genuine and virtual space. Indeed, even up to this degree, I would be upbeat whenever given a rest time and going through it playing with my preferred PC games and would even set out to challenge my kin into a multi-player game by and by. Be that as it may, my recess has constrains as well, and I’m the person who restrains myself from the red line before venturing into it. References: Ridgefield, A. (2009). Computer game Addiction. Adolescent Ink. Recovered April 23, 2014, from http://www. teenink. com/supposition/movies_music_tv/article/82305/Video-Game-Addiction/.

KAAZING

KAAZING INTRODUCTIONMartin: Hey today we are in San Jose with Kaazing and John. John, who are you and what do you do?John: My name is John Fallows and I am the CTO and co-founder here at Kaazing.Martin: Great. What did you do before you started this company?John: Well, prior to Kaazing I was working at Oracle Corporation. I was one of the architects that were responsible for webifying many of Oracle’s applications in their E-business, so during that time our whole team became very familiar with the challenges of building modern web application software at the time. That was around the time that Ajax was incredibly popular and we were responsible for building technologies that made it easier for application developers to take advantage of Ajax without getting caught up in all the technical challenges that that presented.Martin: And how did you make the move from being an employee at Oracle to start your own company? And how did you find your team members?John: So at the time my colleague an d I, Jonas Jacobi who later became my co-founder, we had written a book about the technology that I had been working on. And so by writing this book, we were able to travel the globe, talking at many different developer conferences about technology and so we built up a fairly strong personal brand, the two of us. Being well renowned in the industry for things related to Ajax and other technologies, at the time called Comet that we were responsible for pushing information towards the browser, almost sending information in the wrong direction. So gaining personal brand was very helpful in transitioning to the next phase of creating a corporate brand. So when Jonas and I founded Kaazing, we continued down this path of attending developer conferences and continued to talk about the challenges that were still present in web architecture and many of the solutions that we were able to bring to the table with Kaazing. And the personal brand that we had already build up, pretty much just tra nslated over into Kaazing directly. And this is also a great mechanism to reach the community at large and find people who were interested in joining our mission.Martin: Did you find this idea of Kaazing while you were working at Oracle or, I mean, part time? Or did it just happen when you left Oracle and then said, ‘This is some interesting problem that we should work on’.John: Yeah so actually, we took a little bit of a break in between working in Oracle and starting Kaazing, even spend another brief time at another company in between, both of us. So, this is something that was stemming from this idea of pushing information almost in the wrong direction into browsers and at the time we were getting such a compelling response to attending the various talks that we were providing in these conferences that we felt that the market was having some demand. We even had on several occasions, someone come up to us after our presentation where we would do demos and they would say, ‘I would like to buy your demo’ and of course it’s just demo so you don’t really want to sell it, but it gives you an indication of how compelling this was and how interesting it was to other people.Martin: Did you bootstrapp until some specific point or did you raise external funding for the building the company?John: We raised money from angel investors in the early days to help us get started. And then we used that to continue to fund the company, to build up product line and then to segway into institutional funding afterwards. So now, NEA is a investor in the company, CNTP is an investor in the company and we get a lot of guidance from them from the board membership that they have and helping us steer the company forward.BUSINESS MODELMartin: John, let’s talk about the business model. So can you give us a brief overview in terms of what customers are you serving, what type of value proposition, and what is the pricing structure behind it?John: Certainly. So fundamentally, when we started the company we were about making the web much more interactive, much moreâ€"we’d say real time back then, real time web fully interactive. And so various different markets have different needs in that space. The market that we got interested in tapping early on was the financial services industry. So, they have a requirement to build training applications and so they needed a better latency over the web, they needed the centralized deployment so they needed to use web technology and they were able to use our solution to achieve that. Now, financial services companies, banks and so forth are especially back then, very keen on the perpetual license. And here we were we were a new company, we were providing revolutionary technology and we knew that we wanted to do the subscription model approach but we found it very challenging to break into the financial services with subscription. So in the early days we actually moved to change our approach, our original thinking a nd we moved to perpetual for the early days and that allowed us to land us some fairly sizable accounts in financial accounts in financial services but it was perpetual license with maintenance and upgrades and yearly maintenance after that. So if you fast forward a little bit to more recent times, we found it easier to transition into the subscription model which is incredibly valuable to our company health, corporate health. And it also allows people to try and not necessarilyâ€"they can try things out and see how much they want to buy into and automatically scale up, pay more instantly, things like that. So our subscription model still applies to own premise, it also applies to the cloud like Amazon where elastic scalability is so important for our demand scaling. We have also found that it’s important from an investment thesis standpoint, valuation of a company is deemed more valuable, the more recurring revenue you have that you don’t have to spend more money to get the sam e amount of return the following years, so that’s valuable as well.Martin: So you started with a financial industry and then you added other verticalsJohn: Yeah, so we found that beyond financial services whoâ€"they have a large volume and rate of information to deal with weve certainly being highly relevant to other spaces that are parallel to that such as: online gaming or online betting is very popular in Europe; and also transportation and logistics for information that is highly relevant in the moment, whether it’s gate changes or whether it’s tracking assets like trucks delivering packages, knowing where the trucks are and knowing where the packages are, rerouting the trucks, things like that. These are all recurring style used cases that we found many customers want to use.Martin: And what does your software really do? Imagine, I am logistic company and you come to me, pitch and tell me what is your software solving?John: So, the simplest way to put it I would say is, we’re getting the web out of the way. So if you look back, and I mentioned early where we came from in terms of the architecture strategies that are in place, we are making the web feel more interactive, feel more real time. A lot of energy typically gets put into building prototypes for web applications and whenever the prototypes are finished there are necessary additional steps to go beyond the prototype to get to high availability, disaster recovery, scaling out across the globe for example. With traditional style architecture as you go from one step to the other, you typically are invalidating some design choices that you made in the previous step, so it becomes increasingly more complicated. So what we are really doing is we’re taking advantage of all the pain that we’ve already felt and understood and we’ve moved a lot of the complexities involved kind of underneath the line. So when you finish developing your prototype, the incremental effort to go all the way to hig h availability, disaster recovery, and global scale out, these are all very large benefit’s but small steps in terms of effort because of where you started, so it becomes much easier in terms of value proposition. And what we what found is that that’s all very easy to do and the reason why people want to do it is because what they end up with is simpler more cost-effective architectures that can do more than what they can do before. So we see that, applications that people are building, you hear a lot about things like internet of things, internet of everything, but what it really comes down to is that we are living in a much more connected world. And just as in real life, we are reacting to one another with stimulus, just as you are asking me a question, I am providing you an answer and this is continuing, this is how the applications are evolving. So applications in general, they are becoming more closely modeled to real life because they are interacting with us more and more and the information that they provide that allows us to make good decisions or interact with the world we live in, needs to be done in a more timely way. And there are no rules about what direction the information needs to go in so the concept of a client or a server is very blurred. This concept of only getting a response when you make a request is a little updated now to be able to satisfy the need of that. So, we make all of this interaction very possible. And the other part about these architecture is that they are spread out over the web at large. So they are very geographically distributed, the pieces of the architecture are spread out; the people are spread out; the things are spread out, the data centers, the services inside the data services, they are all spread out from one another. So typically, the web is in the way for some number of these connections that are present in the logical flow of information. So what we are really doing then is we’re getting the web out of the way so that it’s just as easy to architect those kinds of solution as it would be if you are running every inside of your own data center whether there is no web in line.Martin: Imagine, I am a developer of a website or a specific mobile program. I totally understand that once I have developed this and used this service that I can scale more easily without changing very much on the code that I have written. Is there anything else? Because this is something like a server company who is providing some kind of addition backend structure which helps me scale.John: Well, a lot of times people are building applications that when it’s time to scale and the solution is just more hardware added. What we are really talking about is getting more out of the underlying hardware. So, we are eliminating parts of the architecture where people would write application code to glue two of the layers together. Those are the places where the scalability is challenged typically, so we are address ing that eliminating the need for the glue code and creating a fabric that permeate everywhere. That allows us to optimize all the pieces where the is no need to have true application code as they used to and just have the services on the edges and the application user experience on the edges and everything is interacting in a very efficient way. So, if I am building new application then I need to think about it in a different way, I can’t just think about it as a go make a request and I get a response. That type of thinking comes from the days in which the web was born. The web was born as a way to share research papers between university professors and there were much slower networks back then and so there was a heavy emphasis of caching to not waste the network and make it unbearably slow and the rate of change of that information is quite slow, so compared to today’s standard. So as you fast forward and continue to try to use that same tool for the job it has it’s very str ong strengths related to being able to fetch documents and cache them effectively but it may not as be as well suited for these new styles of interaction pattern that we need.CORPORATE STRATEGYMartin: Let’s talk about corporate strategy. What do you perceive Kaazing’s competitive advantage?John: As we compare ourselves in the market place, the way we think about solving these technical challenges is that we tend to divide the product up into layers. So just like good engineering we use the right tool for the job, we put the solution in the right layer of the architecture, having this all layered out nicely gives us unexpected benefits whenever we find that we can out these layers together in new and interesting way. And so I think our competitive advantage on the product line is, we have a high emphasis on performance and scalability and security, starting out in financial services that is not the easiest market to break into. We had a real value to real pain point that they nee ded a solution for but being successful in there really forces you to have a very strong performance scalability, have a very strong security story. And so, starting in that market was difficult but coming from there and coming into other markets we are very naturally strong by definition of where we came from. So, that’s a good competitive edge for us in the market place. The way we think about this stuff, making it possible to put in layers together in different way is also very powerful. For example, we have a feature that we call enterprise shield and that lets us shut down all the firewall ports between the DMZ and the internal trusted network so that no inbound communication is permitted. Now, there are many ways you could try to approach that technically but what we’ve done is we’ve really just changed what’s happening in the lower most layer where connectivity is being established and everything on top is blissfully unaware that that has happened underneath. So this is what I mean by, we are solving it in a layered way but we don’t require, this reaching in across the layers to solve these problems in an efficient manner, we have isolated it to the right layers. That’s from a product standpoint. But I also think that from a philosophical standpoint, the way that we approach things is that we, we tend to not rush into the simplest shortest term win. We tend to want to always understand where our compass is pointing to know where we will likely end up base on what we know now. And so whenever we make a step forward, we generally do that with the intention of aiming it towards a goal that may be 5 or 6 steps farther ahead. Now at the same time, as you make these steps you don’t know what you are going to learn until you’ve try them. And so, whenever we’re moving forward we are also very keen to iterate on learning on what we’ve done and see if it affects where we want to end up. So it’s based on what we’ve learnt and the sum of all of our knowledge so far which is including the experience on the journey towards where we had planned to go. So that’s baked into the DNA of Kaazing and also I would say that within the organization, whenever we talk about things, we don’t come out of a perspective that it’s right or wrong because of who says it. It is very much a way of thinking about things out loud, it’s a safe environment to disagree but it is very important that when you disagree you are able to articulate why. And that gives the conversation an opportunity to spiral upwards towards a common solution that everyone can get behind and not only that but it’s justified and so now we have a very clear understanding of where we are going and why and now it’s clearer how to take the first step and why.Martin: So rational decision-making.John: Yeah, absolutely.Martin: Like we learned it at the universityJohn: Absolutely, absolutely. I applied it in the business context and you know I’ve been in other sit uations where that doesn’t get applied because you can take the logic all the way up to the finish line and say, ‘Well actually we’re going to do something else based on other criteria. And I think it’s very valuable to sort of fold that into the decision-making process and then trust the outcome.MARKET DEVELOPMENTMartin: When you think about the market development, related to what you call glue, so it’s something that has some kind of scalability but it’s not directly connected to the server and what trends can you identify? Can you give us some sort of overview of how the market works, in terms of growth and size as well?John: Well I think, there is these reports about 60 billion connected devices by 2020 and that is talking about the internet of things. But the thing that will make internet of things a reality are the applications that can be built to connect all of those pieces together and so if developers want to move quickly and they want to be able to create thes e new breeds of applications, they need stuff that’s not going to get in their way when they are trying to tie it all together. So that’s why we think that this concept of glue code is really something that really needs to go away and naturally falls away. It’s good to be able to think of architecture in a simpler way. When we talk about those kind of applications, there’s also more modern trends about how to describe the nature of those applications so we tend to think about these applications now as what we call reactive applications, there’s even a reactive manifesto that’s out there.Martin: What’s that?John: It’s trying to describe the context in which an application is running; trying to describe the characteristics of an application that is reacting to stimulus and made up of many disparate pieces; it’s likely message-driven so that it’s responding to stimulus and producing stimulus; and this is all distributed, elastically scalable, and so forth. So this i s an interesting way of thinking about application design and application architecture so that you can evolve these applications over time without being able to turn the whole thing off and switch it on again. You need the ability to evolve the pieces independent of the whole. So this all makes a lot of sense but it hasn’t been how web application development have been thought of historically. So we obviously see a lot of value in this direction and we anticipate that it will continue, to be honest it feels a lot like the early days of Ajax at the moment with reactive applications.Martin: Okay, great.ADVICE TO ENTREPRENEURS In San Jose (CA), we meet CTO co-founder of KAAZING, John Fallows. He shares his story how he co-founded this startup and how the current business model works, as well as what the current plans for near future, and some advice for young entrepreneurs.The transcription of the interview is uploaded below.INTRODUCTIONMartin: Hey today we are in San Jose with Kaazing and John. John, who are you and what do you do?John: My name is John Fallows and I am the CTO and co-founder here at Kaazing.Martin: Great. What did you do before you started this company?John: Well, prior to Kaazing I was working at Oracle Corporation. I was one of the architects that were responsible for webifying many of Oracle’s applications in their E-business, so during that time our whole team became very familiar with the challenges of building modern web application software at the time. That was around the time that Ajax was incredibly popular and we were responsible for building technologies that made it easier for application developers to take advantage of Ajax without getting caught up in all the technical challenges that that presented.Martin: And how did you make the move from being an employee at Oracle to start your own company? And how did you find your team members?John: So at the time my colleague and I, Jonas Jacobi who later became my co-founder, we had written a book about the technology that I had been working on. And so by writing this book, we were able to travel the globe, talking at many different developer conferences about technology and so we built up a fairly strong personal brand, the two of us. Being well renowned in the industry for things related to Ajax and other technologies, at the time called Comet that we were responsible for pushing information towards the browser, almost sending information in the wrong direction. So gaining personal brand was very helpful in transitioning to the next phase of creating a corporate brand. So when Jonas and I founded Kaazing , we continued down this path of attending developer conferences and continued to talk about the challenges that were still present in web architecture and many of the solutions that we were able to bring to the table with Kaazing. And the personal brand that we had already build up, pretty much just translated over into Kaazing directly. And this is also a great mechanism to reach the community at large and find people who were interested in joining our mission.Martin: Did you find this idea of Kaazing while you were working at Oracle or, I mean, part time? Or did it just happen when you left Oracle and then said, ‘This is some interesting problem that we should work on’.John: Yeah so actually, we took a little bit of a break in between working in Oracle and starting Kaazing, even spend another brief time at another company in between, both of us. So, this is something that was stemming from this idea of pushing information almost in the wrong direction into browsers and at the time we were getting such a compelling response to attending the various talks that we were providing in these conferences that we felt that the market was having some demand. We even had on several occasions, someone come up to us after our presentation where we would do demos and they would say, ‘I would like to buy your demo’ and of course it’s just demo so you don’t really want to sell it, but it gives you an indication of how compelling this was and how interesting it was to other people.Martin: Did you bootstrapp until some specific point or did you raise external funding for the building the company?John: We raised money from angel investors in the early days to help us get started. And then we used that to continue to fund the company, to build up product line and then to segway into institutional funding afterwards. So now, NEA is a investor in the company, CNTP is an investor in the company and we get a lot of guidance from them from the board membership that they have and helping us steer the company forward.BUSINESS MODELMartin: John, let’s talk about the business model. So can you give us a brief overview in terms of what customers are you serving, what type of value proposition, and what is the pricing structure behind it?John: Certainly. So fundamentally, when we started the company we were about making the web much more interactive, much moreâ€"we’d say real time back then, real time web fully interactive. And so various different markets have different needs in that space. The market that we got interested in tapping early on was the financial services industry. So, they have a requirement to build training applications and so they needed a better latency over the web, they needed the centralized deployment so they needed to use web technology and they were able to use our solution to achieve that. Now, financial services companies, banks and so forth are especially back then, very keen on the perpetual license. And here we were w e were a new company, we were providing revolutionary technology and we knew that we wanted to do the subscription model approach but we found it very challenging to break into the financial services with subscription. So in the early days we actually moved to change our approach, our original thinking and we moved to perpetual for the early days and that allowed us to land us some fairly sizable accounts in financial accounts in financial services but it was perpetual license with maintenance and upgrades and yearly maintenance after that. So if you fast forward a little bit to more recent times, we found it easier to transition into the subscription model which is incredibly valuable to our company health, corporate health. And it also allows people to try and not necessarilyâ€"they can try things out and see how much they want to buy into and automatically scale up, pay more instantly, things like that. So our subscription model still applies to own premise, it also applies to th e cloud like Amazon where elastic scalability is so important for our demand scaling. We have also found that it’s important from an investment thesis standpoint, valuation of a company is deemed more valuable, the more recurring revenue you have that you don’t have to spend more money to get the same amount of return the following years, so that’s valuable as well.Martin: So you started with a financial industry and then you added other verticalsJohn: Yeah, so we found that beyond financial services whoâ€"they have a large volume and rate of information to deal with weve certainly being highly relevant to other spaces that are parallel to that such as: online gaming or online betting is very popular in Europe; and also transportation and logistics for information that is highly relevant in the moment, whether it’s gate changes or whether it’s tracking assets like trucks delivering packages, knowing where the trucks are and knowing where the packages are, rerouting the tr ucks, things like that. These are all recurring style used cases that we found many customers want to use.Martin: And what does your software really do? Imagine, I am logistic company and you come to me, pitch and tell me what is your software solving?John: So, the simplest way to put it I would say is, we’re getting the web out of the way. So if you look back, and I mentioned early where we came from in terms of the architecture strategies that are in place, we are making the web feel more interactive, feel more real time. A lot of energy typically gets put into building prototypes for web applications and whenever the prototypes are finished there are necessary additional steps to go beyond the prototype to get to high availability, disaster recovery, scaling out across the globe for example. With traditional style architecture as you go from one step to the other, you typically are invalidating some design choices that you made in the previous step, so it becomes increasingly m ore complicated. So what we are really doing is we’re taking advantage of all the pain that we’ve already felt and understood and we’ve moved a lot of the complexities involved kind of underneath the line. So when you finish developing your prototype, the incremental effort to go all the way to high availability, disaster recovery, and global scale out, these are all very large benefit’s but small steps in terms of effort because of where you started, so it becomes much easier in terms of value proposition. And what we what found is that that’s all very easy to do and the reason why people want to do it is because what they end up with is simpler more cost-effective architectures that can do more than what they can do before. So we see that, applications that people are building, you hear a lot about things like internet of things, internet of everything, but what it really comes down to is that we are living in a much more connected world. And just as in real life, we are reacting to one another with stimulus, just as you are asking me a question, I am providing you an answer and this is continuing, this is how the applications are evolving. So applications in general, they are becoming more closely modeled to real life because they are interacting with us more and more and the information that they provide that allows us to make good decisions or interact with the world we live in, needs to be done in a more timely way. And there are no rules about what direction the information needs to go in so the concept of a client or a server is very blurred. This concept of only getting a response when you make a request is a little updated now to be able to satisfy the need of that. So, we make all of this interaction very possible. And the other part about these architecture is that they are spread out over the web at large. So they are very geographically distributed, the pieces of the architecture are spread out; the people are spread out; the things are spread out, the data centers, the services inside the data services, they are all spread out from one another. So typically, the web is in the way for some number of these connections that are present in the logical flow of information. So what we are really doing then is we’re getting the web out of the way so that it’s just as easy to architect those kinds of solution as it would be if you are running every inside of your own data center whether there is no web in line.Martin: Imagine, I am a developer of a website or a specific mobile program. I totally understand that once I have developed this and used this service that I can scale more easily without changing very much on the code that I have written. Is there anything else? Because this is something like a server company who is providing some kind of addition backend structure which helps me scale.John: Well, a lot of times people are building applications that when it’s time to scale and the solution is just more hard ware added. What we are really talking about is getting more out of the underlying hardware. So, we are eliminating parts of the architecture where people would write application code to glue two of the layers together. Those are the places where the scalability is challenged typically, so we are addressing that eliminating the need for the glue code and creating a fabric that permeate everywhere. That allows us to optimize all the pieces where the is no need to have true application code as they used to and just have the services on the edges and the application user experience on the edges and everything is interacting in a very efficient way. So, if I am building new application then I need to think about it in a different way, I can’t just think about it as a go make a request and I get a response. That type of thinking comes from the days in which the web was born. The web was born as a way to share research papers between university professors and there were much slower netw orks back then and so there was a heavy emphasis of caching to not waste the network and make it unbearably slow and the rate of change of that information is quite slow, so compared to today’s standard. So as you fast forward and continue to try to use that same tool for the job it has it’s very strong strengths related to being able to fetch documents and cache them effectively but it may not as be as well suited for these new styles of interaction pattern that we need.CORPORATE STRATEGYMartin: Let’s talk about corporate strategy. What do you perceive Kaazing’s competitive advantage?John: As we compare ourselves in the market place, the way we think about solving these technical challenges is that we tend to divide the product up into layers. So just like good engineering we use the right tool for the job, we put the solution in the right layer of the architecture, having this all layered out nicely gives us unexpected benefits whenever we find that we can out these layers together in new and interesting way. And so I think our competitive advantage on the product line is, we have a high emphasis on performance and scalability and security, starting out in financial services that is not the easiest market to break into. We had a real value to real pain point that they needed a solution for but being successful in there really forces you to have a very strong performance scalability, have a very strong security story. And so, starting in that market was difficult but coming from there and coming into other markets we are very naturally strong by definition of where we came from. So, that’s a good competitive edge for us in the market place. The way we think about this stuff, making it possible to put in layers together in different way is also very powerful. For example, we have a feature that we call enterprise shield and that lets us shut down all the firewall ports between the DMZ and the internal trusted network so that no inbound communication is permitted. Now, there are many ways you could try to approach that technically but what we’ve done is we’ve really just changed what’s happening in the lower most layer where connectivity is being established and everything on top is blissfully unaware that that has happened underneath. So this is what I mean by, we are solving it in a layered way but we don’t require, this reaching in across the layers to solve these problems in an efficient manner, we have isolated it to the right layers. That’s from a product standpoint. But I also think that from a philosophical standpoint, the way that we approach things is that we, we tend to not rush into the simplest shortest term win. We tend to want to always understand where our compass is pointing to know where we will likely end up base on what we know now. And so whenever we make a step forward, we generally do that with the intention of aiming it towards a goal that may be 5 or 6 steps farther ahead. Now at the same time, as you make these steps you don’t know what you are going to learn until you’ve try them. And so, whenever we’re moving forward we are also very keen to iterate on learning on what we’ve done and see if it affects where we want to end up. So it’s based on what we’ve learnt and the sum of all of our knowledge so far which is including the experience on the journey towards where we had planned to go. So that’s baked into the DNA of Kaazing and also I would say that within the organization, whenever we talk about things, we don’t come out of a perspective that it’s right or wrong because of who says it. It is very much a way of thinking about things out loud, it’s a safe environment to disagree but it is very important that when you disagree you are able to articulate why. And that gives the conversation an opportunity to spiral upwards towards a common solution that everyone can get behind and not only that but it’s justified and so now we have a very clear unde rstanding of where we are going and why and now it’s clearer how to take the first step and why.Martin: So rational decision-making.John: Yeah, absolutely.Martin: Like we learned it at the universityJohn: Absolutely, absolutely. I applied it in the business context and you know I’ve been in other situations where that doesn’t get applied because you can take the logic all the way up to the finish line and say, ‘Well actually we’re going to do something else based on other criteria. And I think it’s very valuable to sort of fold that into the decision-making process and then trust the outcome.MARKET DEVELOPMENTMartin: When you think about the market development, related to what you call glue, so it’s something that has some kind of scalability but it’s not directly connected to the server and what trends can you identify? Can you give us some sort of overview of how the market works, in terms of growth and size as well?John: Well I think, there is these reports about 60 billion connected devices by 2020 and that is talking about the internet of things. But the thing that will make internet of things a reality are the applications that can be built to connect all of those pieces together and so if developers want to move quickly and they want to be able to create these new breeds of applications, they need stuff that’s not going to get in their way when they are trying to tie it all together. So that’s why we think that this concept of glue code is really something that really needs to go away and naturally falls away. It’s good to be able to think of architecture in a simpler way. When we talk about those kind of applications, there’s also more modern trends about how to describe the nature of those applications so we tend to think about these applications now as what we call reactive applications, there’s even a reactive manifesto that’s out there.Martin: What’s that?John: It’s trying to describe the context in which an applicat ion is running; trying to describe the characteristics of an application that is reacting to stimulus and made up of many disparate pieces; it’s likely message-driven so that it’s responding to stimulus and producing stimulus; and this is all distributed, elastically scalable, and so forth. So this is an interesting way of thinking about application design and application architecture so that you can evolve these applications over time without being able to turn the whole thing off and switch it on again. You need the ability to evolve the pieces independent of the whole. So this all makes a lot of sense but it hasn’t been how web application development have been thought of historically. So we obviously see a lot of value in this direction and we anticipate that it will continue, to be honest it feels a lot like the early days of Ajax at the moment with reactive applications.Martin: Okay, great.ADVICE TO ENTREPRENEURSMartin: John, imagine if a friend comes to you and asks you , ‘John, what should and shouldn’t I do when I start a company?’. What would you recommend to him?John: I think the first thing I would say isâ€"I think it was Guy Kawasaki said this, ‘Scratch your own itch’. So the whole concept of finding something that is a problem for you personally that you really want to solve, so solve for yourself. So in our case, we had been going at these web architectures and constantly fighting against the challenges and the constraints in which success was defined based on those available choices. And we finally said, Let’s challenge the own concept and turn it on it’s head and introduce the new standard that we needed up helping to create called web socket; let’s create full duplex by directional communication over the web; lets use it as a foundational layer to service all the layer above; and really stop adding all these work arounds where we are trying to retrafit old techniques to new problem and space. So I think that would be the first thing as to what to do.What not to do, I think it’s important to have a balanced approach so in the sense that technical innovation is important, your go to market strategy is also important. Some companies may heavily emphasize on one or the other. I think, I would recommend not over extending either one and having a much more balanced approach to knowing how customers are actually going to achieve value from what you are doing. So clearly, there can be technical optimizations in any solution. It is possible to market something very successfully and then possibly not be defensible technically. So I think it’s very important to have a good balance of both of those.Martin: What mistakes have you made over the last 3 ro 4 years and what have you learnt?John: Oh, That could take a long time. Let’s see, I would say early on we did it the hard way. So many companies whenever they approach these opportunities they my create an open source project and they might create a lot of market awareness through that. I think that’s an excellent way to achieve a lot of people being familiar with your approach to things. I also think, we went the route of defining a new standard which has been successful in terms of being picked up by all the major browser vendors; they all have websocket in there now. And so we are very honored to being a part of that process to help create the websocket standard, but that takes a while. So that takes a while in terms of business, in terms of a young company, sustaining themselves while that’s playing out, to put themselves in a strong position for being so highly relevant as that plays out. So there maybe other better ways to do that more efficiently and in a more timely manner. But I think that having come through it and now being on the other side of it obviously, it’s a great place to be now, it just takes some time.Martin: Okay. John, thank you very much for your time. And next time you want to start a company try to res olve your biggest pain because I am pretty sure thousands of other people will have the same problem and might be willing to pay for it. Thank you very much. Thank you, John.John: You’re welcome.

3 Formats for GMAT Inequalities Questions You Need to Know

As if solving inequalities wasn’t already hard enough, sometimes the way a GMAT  question is framed will make us wonder which answer option to choose, even after we have already solved solved the problem. Let’s look at three different question formats today to understand the difference between them: Must Be True Could Be True Complete Range Case 1: Must Be True If |-x/3 + 1| 2, which of the following must be true? (A) x 0 (B) x 8 (C) x -4 (D) 0 x 3 (E) None of the above We have two linked inequalities here. One is |-x/3 + 1| 2 and the other is the correct answer choice. We need to think about how the two  are related. We are given that |-x/3 + 1| 2. So we know that x satisfies this inequality. That will give us the universe which is relevant to us. x will take one of those values only. So let’s solve this inequality. (We will not focus on how to solve the inequality in this post it has already been discussed here. We will just quickly show  the steps.) |x/3 1| 2 (1/3) * |x 3| 2 |x 3| 6 The distance of x from 3 is less than 6, so -3 x 9. Now we know  that every value that x can take will lie within  this range. The question now becomes: what must be true for each of these values of x? Lets assess each of our answer options with this question: (A) x 0 Will each of the values of x  be positive? No   x could be a negative number greater than -3, such as  -2. (B) x 8 Will each of the values of x  be less than 8? No x could be a number between 8 and 9, such as 8.5 (C) x -4 Will each of the values of x be more than -4? Yes! x will take values ranging from -3 to 9, and each of the values within that range will be greater than -4. So this must be true. (D) 0 x 3 Will each of these values be between 0 and 3. No since x can take any of the values between -3 and 9, not all of these will be just between 0 and 3. Therefore, the answer is C (we dont even need to evaluate answer choice E since C is true). Case 2: Could Be True If −1 x 5, which is the following could be true? (A) 2x 10 (B) x 17/3 (C) x^2 27 (D) 3x + x^2 −2 (E) 2x – x^2 0 Again, we have two linked inequalities, but here the relation between them will be a bit different. One of the inequalities is   −1 x 5 and the other will be the correct answer choice. We are given that -1 x 5, so x lies between -1 and 5. We need an answer choice that  Ã¢â‚¬Å"could be true†. This means only some of the values between -1 and 5 should satisfy the condition set by the correct answer choice all of the values need not satisfy. Lets evaluate our answer options: (A) 2x 10 x 5 No values between -1 and 5 will be greater than 5, so this cannot be true. (B) x 17/3 x 5.67 No values between -1 and 5 will be greater than 5.67, so this cannot be true. (C) x^2 27 x^2 27 0 x 3*√(3) or x -3*√(3) √(3) is about 1.73 so 3*1.73 = 5.19. No value of x will be greater than 5.19. Also, -3*1.73 will be -5.19 and no value of x will be less than that. So this cannot be true. (Details on how to solve such inequalities  are discussed here.) (D) 3x + x^2 −2 x^2 + 3x + 2 0 (x + 1)(x + 2) 0 -2 x -1 No values of x will lie between -2 and -1, so this also cannot be true. (E) 2x – x^2 0 x * (x 2) 0 x 2 or x 0 If -1 x 5, then  x could lie between -1 and 0 (x 0 is possible) or between 2 and 5 (x 2 is possible). Therefore, the correct answer is E. Case 3: Complete Range Which of the following represents the complete range of x over which x^3 – 4x^5 0? (A) 0 |x|  ½ (B) |x|  ½ (C) - ½ x 0 or  ½ x (D) x - ½ or 0 x  ½ (E) x - ½ or x 0 We have two linked inequalities, but the relation between them will be a bit different again. One of the inequalities is   x^3 4x^5 0 and the other will be the correct answer choice. We are given that x^3 4x^5 0. This inequality can be solved to: x^3 ( 1 4x^2) 0 x^3*(2x + 1)*(2x 1) 0 x   1/2 or -1/2 x 0 This is our universe of the values of x. It is given that all values of x lie in this range. Here, the question asks us the complete range of x. So we need to look for exactly this range. This is given in  answer choice C, and therefore C is our answer. We hope these practice problems will help you become able to distinguish between the three cases now. Getting ready to take the GMAT? We have  free online GMAT seminars  running all the time. And, be sure to follow us on  Facebook,  YouTube,  Google+, and  Twitter! Karishma, a Computer Engineer with a keen interest in alternative Mathematical approaches, has mentored students in the continents of Asia, Europe and North America. She teaches the  GMAT  for Veritas Prep and regularly participates in content development projects such as  this blog!

Compare the Functionalist and Marxist Perspective on Society

COMPARE THE FUNCTIONALIST AND MARXIST PERSPECTIVE ON SOCIETY INTRODUCTION â€Å"Lotto a ticket to your dreams† Vote Lucky Five and give yourself a chance fi step up inna life†. These slogans represent the societal belief of the Jamaican people that there are means by which one individual can move from one stratum of the Jamaican society to another. In some societies ones position in society is ascribed and fixed as in many Asian societies. These systems reinforce the idea of inequality and social change is nearly impossible. There are many different sociological theories that attempt to explain how society or aspects of society work together. Different theories try to understand social behaviour at different levels of investigation. There are†¦show more content†¦Marxism In Contemporary Sociological Theory, Wallace and Wolf define Marxist theory as a sociological theory that identifies economic factors as the fundamental determinant of social structure and change (Wallace and Wolf 78-79). According to Marxist theory, economics shapes our society and determines our interests. As a result of economic factors, classes are formed and conflicts arise, this the theorists contends happens because one class cannot make economic gains without exploiting another class. When the exploitation becomes evident, the classes will struggle for power. The Marxist theory explains social structure through class struggle. One class exploits the product of the labor of another class in order to prosper. This prediction that the â€Å"exploited masses† would increase and defeat the capitalist system has not happened yet, but the prediction and the senses behind it are adequate knowledge to union leaders and business societies alike. Any infirmity or ineffectiveness in the functioning of these simple mechanisms aid in accounting for difficulty and disequilibrium or the end of order. â€Å"Marxist analysis starts with the essential theory that people must produce in order to live†. Individual societies can be seen as subsystems working within an â€Å"increasingly interconnected global system of transnational economic, legal institutions, and politics†. CONCLUSION Functionalism and Marxism are both knownShow MoreRelatedCompare and Contrast the Functionalist and Marxist views on the Family1508 Words   |  7 Pagesï » ¿Compare and Contrast the Functionalist and Marxist views on the Family Functionalists argue that societies consist of inter-related social institutions such as schools, mass media, political systems, the Church and the family each of which contribute positively to the maintenance of stability of society as a whole. Broadly speaking it is assumed by functionalists that societies operate in the interests of all of their members so that there is no reason for fundamental conflict in society. InsteadRead MoreFunctionalism and Marxism: Sociological Perspectives Essay670 Words   |  3 PagesSociological Concepts and Perspectives: Functionalism and Marxism In this essay I am going to compare and contrast Functionalism and Marxism. They are both sociological perspectives which have theories about society and the people that live within it. They attempt to explain how society influences people, and similarly how people influence society. However, the two perspectives are clearly different. Functionalism is a macro system theory which sees society as a mega structure of linked socialRead MoreDiscuss Marxism and Functuionalism and Compare1133 Words   |  5 PagesCompare Marxist and Functionalist Perspectives Compare and Contrast Functionalist and Marxist Perspectives Sociology is a systematic way of studying the social world. It seeks to discover the causes and affects of intercommunication and interaction that arise in social relations. The science of society was developed as a discipline in the 19th Century by Auguste Compte, a French philosopher. For him, common sense and the obvious would not suffice; he wanted to build scientific theories basedRead MoreCompare the Functionalist and Marxist Views on Social Stratification1734 Words   |  7 PagesCRITICALLY COMPARE MARXISM AND FUNCTIONALISM IN THE WAY EACH PERSPECTIVE CONCEPTUALIZES THE PHENOMENON OF SOCIAL STRATIFICATION. Social stratification refers to the presence of distinct social groups which are ranked one above the other in terms of factors such as prestige and wealth (Haralambos Holborn, 2004). Those who belong to a particular group or stratum will have some awareness of common interests and a common identity. They also share a similarRead MoreCompare the Functionalist and Marxist Views on Social Stratification1740 Words   |  7 PagesCRITICALLY COMPARE MARXISM AND FUNCTIONALISM IN THE WAY EACH PERSPECTIVE CONCEPTUALIZES THE PHENOMENON OF SOCIAL STRATIFICATION. Social stratification refers to the presence of distinct social groups which are ranked one above the other in terms of factors such as prestige and wealth (Haralambos Holborn, 2004). Those who belong to a particular group or stratum will have some awareness of common interests and a common identity. They also share a similar lifestyleRead MoreCompare and contrast two main sociological theories of crime and deviance.1636 Words   |  7 Pagesï » ¿ Compare and contrast the two main sociological theories of crime and deviance. Deviance and crime are wide-ranging terms used by sociologists to refer to behavior that varies, in some way, from a social norm.  Cultural Norms are societys propensity towards certain ideals; their aversion from others; and their standard, ritualistic practices. Essentially the norm is a summation of typical activities and beliefs of group of people.  This essay will evaluate the sociological theories associatedRead MoreDiscuss and Evaluate the Functionalist, Marxist and Feminist Ideologies of Contemporary Society1068 Words   |  5 Pagesevaluate the Functionalist, Marxist and Feminist ideologies of contemporary society In this assignment, I am going to briefly explore the definitions of Functionalism, Marxism and Feminism and how their ideologies affect contemporary society in Great Britain. In doing so I will give examples that expand upon the definitions and illustrate that such ideologies are evident and still have an impact on the society we live in. Functionalists believe that all elements within a society interconnectRead MoreMarx s Theory Of Alienation1298 Words   |  6 Pages(1818-1883) who believed that society is proportioned into two: The capitalists, and the workers. The capitalists are the dominant class, they are the elite members of society that come from wealth. The workers are the middle class, they work to survive in society. Although the capitalists are from wealth, the majority of the population is middle class. Because the capitalists have wealth and significant control over the middle class, there is inequality of power in society. Marx had observed that middleRead MoreSocial Stratification According to Marx and Weber1163 Words   |  5 PagesSocial stratification is the hierarchical arrangement of individuals into divisions of power and wealth within a society. Social stratification relates to the socio-economic concept of class, consisting of the upper class, middle class, and lower class. Each class may be further subdivided into smaller classes through the main indicator is occupation. This is the most practical and most effective means of encompassing the wide variety of economic and social elements that go to make up a person’sRead MoreCompare and Contrast Any Two Sociological Theories and Briefly Evaluate Them.2079 Words   |  9 PagesCompare and contrast any two sociological theories and briefly evaluate them. In the following essay I am going to compare and contrast the theories of marxism and functionalism, looking at the topics of the family and education. Functionalism has a macro-structural approach to society. It looks at society as a whole and is known as a consensus perspective i.e. everyone agrees on social norms and values and people work together to maintain society. These norms and values are learned by social